Wednesday, February 07, 2007

Come Out Into the Light

"Sex scandal pastor says after therapy, he's heterosexual"

The title of this San Francisco Chronicle article caught my eye. I don't know how many are familiar with the Ted Haggard story. The short of it? ...He was the senior pastor of a church in Colorado, as well as the president of the National Association of Evangelicals. Then last fall, when he began to promote a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, a man named Michael Jones came forward and exposed their 3 year affair.
Rev. Haggard, who is married, was "ousted by the overseers" of his church last November, and has apparently been in counseling/therapy in Phoenix.
For three weeks.

He wrote in an email to members of the church that his three weeks of counseling in Phoenix have felt like, "three years' worth of analysis and treatment," and that, "Jesus is starting to put me back together."
Another reverend from the church, Tim Ralph "told the Denver Post that Haggard had come out of the counseling convinced of his heterosexuality." Ralph went on to say,"He is completely heterosexual." Saying also that Haggard's "homosexual behavior had not been a 'constant thing.'"

The highlight of the article for me, was the input of Dr. Jack Drescher, a psychiatrist from New York who specializes and is considered an expert in the studies/issues of gender and sexuality. Dr. Drescher said, "while it was people's prerogative to identify their sexual orientation as they wanted, the notion of being able to change that orientation was 'not consistent with clinical presentations, but totally consistent with theological belief.' "
He continues, "Some people in the community that Haggard comes from believe homosexuality is a form of behavior, a sinful form of behavior based on certain things in the Bible, and they don't believe you can create a healthy identity based on sinful behavior. ...So they define it as a behavior that can be changed, and there is this thinking that if you control those behaviors enough, heterosexual attractions will follow."

The article is ended with a comment from the Rev. Tim Ralph that he had shared with the Denver Post- that the overseers of Haggard's church "had recommended to Haggard that he take up secular work."


So much here.
First of all, what a huge rejection and repulsion from Haggard's community, his church. That is really sad to me, that they wouldn't surround him and support him and love him during this time in his life amidst all the judgement that is falling on him. That is huge. And a huge issue within the traditional Christian church, i think. When people "fall by the wayside"- whether merely the perception of others or actual hard times, there is a withdrawal, a distance that is, i feel, deliberately created. As though they are no longer deserving of your full interaction, connection, and love, or that their "sinfulness" might rub off on you.
Where is the understanding of Grace? Of the fact that none of us are perfect, and no one is worse than the other? Forgiveness?? interesting.

Another issue that arises for me is Haggard's hypocrisy. And what of Michael Jones? First of all, props to him for outing his lover who was sharing his bed, and then preaching the evils of homosexuality and publicly supporting a discriminatory and unconstitutional amendment. Secondly, the poor man. He must feel such a sense of betrayal. To prevent any further damage to his position and reputation in the Christian world, Ted Haggard (whom he had been intimate with for three years), cast him and all consideration for him aside , completely disregarding his feelings and his humanity and reducing him to a sinful act, a bad choice made, some sort of depravity that requires therapy to resolve. wow.
And the real issue here isn't the details of this specific case that was brought to the public's attention. The deeper issue is that this is not a rare occurrence, an isolated event. We are trading honesty and reality for hypocrisy.

Something else that this brought up for me was the human ability to define terms and create definitions for everything imaginable. By doing this, in essence, we have the ability to create our own realities...the laws and terms by which we live. The trouble is, groups and sects, (and major religions) can all create contradicting, differing definitions whose collisions can be disastrous.
I don't think that homosexuality is a "form of behavior" and i don't think that changing your behavior changes your sexual orientation; in fact, i know it doesn't.

And yes, you can change your behavior- who you date for example. And i know many who have. They believe that it is against God to fall in love with and pursue someone of the same physical sex and so, they break up. They stay single. They pray harder. Does this mean that their interest and attraction to people of the same physical sex just go away?? No. And does this mean that they will fall in love with and be physically and sexually attracted to someone of the opposite physical sex? In some cases, maybe. In most, probably not. In some, never.

I think we are all broken and beautiful people. I think if we could all just be HONEST with each other and be open about who we really are, we would all be so much better off. We could all let our bellies hang out and laugh together and realize that we are the same. And judgement would stop, because we would realize that we are what we're judging. I think that there are so many people in the church today that are hiding. And, metaphorically speaking, i think we all need to come out.

6 comments:

glen. said...

I think you have some great points. There have been a number of times where I have screwed up, and screwed up bad, and when I've come to the particular ecclesiastic authorities could have turned on me and thrown me to the wolves. But I have been especially blessed to have God put people in my life who have forgiven me and helped me with the frayed ends of a life coming undone.

I wonder if in part the suggestion of secular work isn't a little bit to calm the frenzy of the non-Christian world. You said, "I don't know how many are familiar with the Ted Haggard story" but it really was on the cover of every major paper, every talking head on either side of the isle had a minimum of three shows with topics inspired by the Ted Haggard scandal. I mean, there was probably even a "Fox News Alert" about it. I'm not justifying their position, but I could see how we could just be trying to avoid another Jimmy Swaggart. I wonder if at least in part they aren't trying to let the public eye turn away first before he emerges. It's interesting, the Christian army really is the only army which shoots its wounded. And we tend to put a lot of stock into the passage where Paul talks about being "disqualified" from ministry.

But I think it really is important to see what Paul is talking about: he's talking about doing something stupid which makes other people see Christ in a bad light. I think everything I've heard from that story is people really trying to patch ol' Uncle Ted back together. With something like marital infidelity, there is going to be inevitable fallout which probably requires some form of recovery. Christians call it restoration, fine, but it would be stupid to live in the fog of the dissociative fantasy world you've created for as long as Mr. Haggard did, and not actively try and undo some of the lies/false systems you've bought into. Not to mention take your kids out for ice cream to apologize for messing everything up.

I've been thinking a lot lately about the passage which calls Joseph a good man. It says that he was going to send Mary away quietly "because he was a good man". I think that's sweet in a sense. Maybe he loved her was hurt because of her suspected infidelity. I don't know the culture very well, but I do know that sex outside of the context of marriage was a legal matter. But the "goodness" of Joseph is manifested in his not making a huge fuss of it, but "putting her away silently". I will be the first to admit that maybe it was cultural, and I don't think we should just be sweeping the complexities of living with a destructive sin nature under the rug. But I think there is something to helping a friend deal without public scrutiny is kind.

As far as the homosexuality goes? Eh, I'm leaving that one be. But it should be noted that we're not talking about Brokeback Mountain, we're talking about a guy who went to another one with a false name and an envelope containing money in exchange for sex. Sure, there's a relationship, maybe even some natural intimacy sex brings into an equation, but I don't think we're talking about the same thing. I prayed for a long time for Michael Jones. This is how he sees the church. That sucks.

Maybe you feel different, Rach. Love to hear you continuing thoughts. Also, if you want an interesting movie to watch you should check out "Through the Eyes of Tammy Faye". You know, if you need anymore reasons to not like Jerry Falwell. That and "One Punk under God" is on iTunes (first episode is free). I love you, Rach.

Anonymous said...

i wonder though, if it wouldn't be a good example of forgiveness and love to have Ted Haggard be accepted back by his church...you had mentioned, "to calm the frenzy of the non-Christian world," but what if he was accepted back- i mean, how many times has that happened, you know? it could either cause more cries of hypocrisy or be an amazing example to the world of what we say we believe. interesting.

About the intimacy between Michael Jones and Ted Haggard, who knows, right? only the two of them, and Ted Haggard certainly isn't going to admit to any emotional intimacy...and it was unclear to me whether Jones had "previously" been prostituting and was monogamous with Haggard or whether he had been prostituting the entire time- because honestly, either way, the media would have called him a prostitute. even if he had prostituted for two years, twenty years ago- they would have called him a prostitute. do you know what i mean?

anyway, thanks so much for your input. i appreciate the comments and food for thought. i love you too, Glen.

glen. said...

Uh, I think you're extrapolating a little. Again, homosexual or otherwise, when you step out of marriage into affairs you're delving into a world of subjective illusion.

I agree that people need grace. No "buts". At the same time, God's standard for leadership is high, and one must be sober enough to see where they're going. Paul talks about this in his qualifications for leadership in the Pastoral Epistles. One of the qualifications for leadership is "temperate" which in the Greek can mean "free from addictions". I don't know of one article which talks about them throwing him to the wayside or even not liking him. It genuinely seems like his congregation stand with him. But even Gavin Newsom in the fallout of his affair seems to feel like he needs to tell people he's doing something to change his temperament. And while I have a hard time drawing the connection between alcoholism and sleeping with your friend's wife as he does, he seems to be trying to gain a certain amount of restoration himself through that process. I don't think it's a question of forgiveness: he is forgiven, and Haggard seems to be forgiven by his people, it's a question of "is he in the best mindset to be governing the direction for God's people." Is he done forever with ministry? If it were up to me, no way, man. Not on anything. Heck, if Jim Bakker is back, then there really is hope for anyone, isn't there?

"Jones has said he met Haggard three years ago when the pastor answered his escort ad, pretending to be a man from Kansas City named 'Art.'" is what CNN says regarding their relationship. So, again, I don't think their relationship started out all Ledger/Gyllenhaal-esque.

But I agree with you in part. I think God's love is foolish and wonderful. His forgiveness is incredible and limitless. I was explaining the Parable of the Prodigal Son today to someone who'd never even heard the story. I was so grateful to get to hear the story again through his ears and hear how he would react to the different turns the younger son would make. He really liked the idea that no matter how far away we get, no matter what kind of place we find ourselves in that the God of the Universe loved us first and offers forgiveness in the midst of it. I have a hard time with that. I even sat in front of someone yesterday and confessed to them I'd honestly been questioning my salvation over the past several months because how badly I'd screwed up (in all honesty). As I was explaining the Father running to his son and how much he loved us, I found myself strangely believing it might also be true unto me also. Glory to our God that His forgiveness is as vast as it is, that He would find me, someone so sinful, lovely.

I tried writing less this time. Oh well. I'm off to the Palmers.

glen. said...

(And I love you a lot. Your blog is like passion in electronic form.)

Raquel said...

Don't get me wrong, i am not suggesting that Haggard reclaim his role as king of the American Evangelical world...i am merely suggesting that public support and love from his community is dearly needed, and could possibly blow some people's minds...in a good way.
I think that if someone is involved in marital infidelity, they have some inner work to do- some issues to work out and heal. i am not suggesting that Haggard is back in a place of leadership before that happens. Though i do think there is a special sort of stigma saved for "homosexual activity" in the Christian community.
Would it have been the same outrage and reaction if he had been sleeping with his female secretary? I don't think so.
He also could have just as easily gone to a female prostitute...so while it is an extra-marital affair, i believe the more outrageous issue for his church, and the public, is that it was a gay, male affair.

And, i don't have any illusions about a "Gyllenhal and Ledger" relationship- clearly this is not a Hollywood gay love affair. Brokeback Mountain dealt with the shame that so many people feel about who they fall in love with and the devastating consequences of intolerance and hatred. The characters in that film had to deal with so much self-loathing...which i think is closer to the point that i'm trying to make. If Ted Haggard is attracted to men, as clearly, he is, wouldn't it be better to come out and tell the world, and then change his behavior and make choices according to what he considers Right? He can consider himself whatever orientation he wishes, and he can choose to stay married to his wife and decide to live in monogomy...and that's that.

but how do these things happen in the first place?? that's my point- People supress and hide things and then sneak around and do it in the dark...do you see what i'm saying?

If we are to come into the light to expose ourselves and be REAL, then those things which control and haunt us in the dark have no power. Or less at least.
And we don't have to plague ourselves with worry that "someday, someone might find out what a fake i am...!"
It takes power away from fear and suppression. It causes all facades to drop away...we may be naked, and it may not be pretty, but we're all naked together. do you see what i am saying?

it's better than fake Sunday morning smiles and
"Hi! How are you?!"
"Hi! How are you?!?"
like we are all perfectly alright.

i dunno...pretty idealistic i guess. i just think REAL HONESTY is so, so, so important.

Raquel said...

(and i love you a lot too, Glen. and i am thankful that we can have this dialogue. it is needed, i think.)

(oh! and thank you for what you said about my blog.)